Auditor sanctions and the management of riskiness of audit client portfolios
International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, ISSN: 1740-8016, Vol: 15, Issue: 2, Page: 144-167
2019
- 4Usage
- 5Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage4
- Abstract Views4
- Captures5
- Readers5
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Auditor sanctions and the management of riskiness of audit client portfolios
Home Full-text access for editors by Hsiao-Lun Lin; Ai-Ru Yen International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation (IJAAPE) , Vol. 15, No. 2, 2019
Article Description
This study examines the effect of auditor sanctions imposed on the riskiness of auditors’ client portfolios. We identify auditors/audit firms that were subject to disciplinary actions by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) and empirically examine the change in the riskiness of their client portfolios after the sanctions were imposed. The empirical results suggest a decrease in the overall clientele financial risk, measured by both aggregate bankruptcy measures and individual financial risk measures, after enforcement releases were issued. Moreover, we find that the decrease in client portfolios’ risk is greater when a disciplinary action is imposed in the period of higher legal liability than when it is imposed in the period of lower legal liability. This study contributes to prior studies on the effects of audit failure on auditors’ behaviour by examining the association between auditor sanctions and the management of audit client portfolios risk.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85065604612&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijaape.2019.099141; http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=99141; http://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/full/10.1504/IJAAPE.2019.099141; https://neiudc.neiu.edu/abf-pub/11; https://neiudc.neiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=abf-pub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijaape.2019.099141; https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJAAPE.2019.099141
Inderscience Publishers
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know