EQUIVALENCE TESTING IN AGRICULTURE EXPERIMENTS
Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture
1997
- 213Usage
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage213
- Downloads205
- Abstract Views8
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Equivalence testing is a relatively new area of research in statistics. It's development has been motivated in large part by the need for statistical methods for determining if generic drugs are bioequivalent to their name brand counterparts. The application of equivalence testing methods to data resulting from experiments and surveys unrelated to drug development, and in particular agriculture-related experiments, is infrequent and possibly non-existent. These methods provide useful alternatives to the analysis methods currently being used. In this paper, an overview of the philosophy of equivalence testing and a review of equivalence testing methods are presented. Additionally, experimental situations for which equivalence testing would be appropriate are discussed. Examples that illustrate the application of the philosphy of equivalence testing to experimental designs commonly used in agriculture research are also presented.
Bibliographic Details
https://newprairiepress.org/agstatconference/1997/proceedings/10; http://dx.doi.org/10.4148/2475-7772.1301; https://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1301&context=agstatconference; https://dx.doi.org/10.4148/2475-7772.1301; https://newprairiepress.org/agstatconference/1997/proceedings/10/
New Prairie Press
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know