Neuropsychological profiling of symptom exaggeration and malingering
Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, ISSN: 1521-1029, Vol: 3, Issue: 1-2, Page: 227-240
2002
- 23Citations
- 56Usage
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef10
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Usage56
- Abstract Views56
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Review Description
The theory of profile analysis is generally accepted as a basis for forming expert opinions about symptom exaggeration and malingering. Methods that rely on profile analysis are frequently the only ones that can be applied retrospectively to the interpretation of test results contained in case records. Profile patterns may well be more difficult to coach than external measures, and when combined with other methods offer a convenient source of convergent information about test validity. This paper reviews techniques for the identification of malingered head injury by analysis of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - 3rd edition (Wechsler, 1997a), Halstead-Reitan Battery (Reitan & Wolfson, 1985), or Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (Wechsler, 1987) profile. These techniques lend themselves to the report of specific statements about the probability of malingering that are easily understood by the court and are likely to meet current standards for evidentiary reliability. © 2002 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0036971825&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j151v03n01_03; http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J151v03n01_03; http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1300/J151v03n01_03; https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cps_facarticles/674; https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1369&context=cps_facarticles
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know