Core corporate governance dilemmas facing boards: A South African perspective
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, ISSN: 2222-3436, Vol: 12, Issue: 2, Page: 194-210
2009
- 5Citations
- 37Usage
- 38Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- Usage37
- Abstract Views37
- Captures38
- Readers38
- 38
Article Description
Directors and boards face many challenges in terms of managing complexity. A key factor of success in practising good corporate governance is the board's ability to cope with paradox. The purpose of this research has been to explore the core corporate governance dilemmas facing boards. The investigation was qualitative in nature using the Delphi technique. Six core corporate governance dilemmas facing board members were identified one of which is not mentioned in the international literature. The findings should provide directors with an ability to identify the nature of the paradoxes to which they need to respond.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77949923415&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v12i2.276; https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/276; https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/viewFile/276/94; https://nsuworks.nova.edu/hcbe_facarticles/717; https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1702&context=hcbe_facarticles; https://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v12i2.276
AOSIS
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know