Clinically Relevant Safety Issues Associated with St. John’s Wort Product Labels
2008
- 4Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage4
- Abstract Views4
Poster Description
Background. St. John’s wort (SJW) interacts with drugs including cyclosporine, indinavir, and warfarin. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) are often unaware of these interactions. The product label is one source of information and inclusion of interaction information on SJW labels is associated with more appropriate counseling being dispensed. Objective. To evaluate clinically relevant safety information on SJW product labels. Methods. Categories of label safety issues were established as: 1) drug interactions, 2) contraindications, 3) therapeutic duplication, and 4) general considerations. Evaluations of labels were performed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize and Chi square and ANOVA were performed to detect a difference in product scores. A post-hoc Duncan test was conducted to examine the data for differences in label scores between individual products. Results. The percentage of the 74 SJW products with label information present was: SJW-HIV (8.11%), SJW-immuno-suppressants (5.45%), SJW-oral contraceptives (8.108%), SJW-warfarin (5.41%), bipolar (1.35%), antidepressants (22.97%), phototoxicity (51.35%), and consult HCP (87.84%). The mean number of safety warnings included on a product label was 1.84 (range 0-8). Both ANOVA (p=0.005) and Chi square (p=0.008) showed that differences existed between the label scores of SJW products. The post-hoc Duncan test revealed that the scores of three products were statistically superior in terms of completeness (p=0.04). Conclusion. The majority of SJW product labels inadequately address safety issues. A few products provide an acceptable amount of safety information, which could enhance the quality of counseling by HCPs. However, the greatest benefit may be if the FDA re-examined labeling requirements of dietary supplements.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know