The Impact of Antidepressants Use on Mental Healthcare Use
2018
- 11Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage11
- Abstract Views11
Lecture / Presentation Description
Objective. To determine whether patients with type 2 diabetes on antidepressant treatment were being monitored by a mental health professional (MHP). Background. Depression often occurs co-morbidly with diabetes; however, it is often unrecognized and undertreated in nearly two-thirds of patients with both conditions. Studies that assess mental health treatment are limited. Methods. This retrospective study was a secondary data analysis of the cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2005-2014). It included adults with type 2 diabetes and mild to severe depression symptoms. The dichotomous outcome was whether patients had seen a MHP (e.g., psychologist or psychiatrist) in the last 12 months. Sociodemographic, clinical, and behavioral factors were compared among 2 study groups: those on an antidepressant and those on no treatment. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses evaluated the association of antidepressant use and MHP monitoring. Results. 966 subjects met inclusion criteria and 33.2% were on antidepressants. Seventy-seven percent of patients on treatment had not been followed by a specialist. Univariate analysis determined that those using antidepressants were 7.11 times more likely to have seen a MHP (23% v. 8%, p Conclusion.Diabetes patients with depression symptoms are generally not being monitored by a MHP, unless they are receiving medications. However, the majority of those on medications are not regularly followed by a MPH. Monitoring by a MHP should be the standard of care regardless of medication use.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know