Are High-Protein Diets Really Bad to the Bone?
2018
- 19Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage19
- Abstract Views19
Poster Description
Objective. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if a high-protein diet affected various parameters of whole body and lumbar bone health in exercise-trained women. Background. It has been posited that consuming a high-protein diet causes calcium to leach from your skeleton; thus promoting demineralization. Methods. Twenty-four women volunteered for this investigation (n=12 control, n=12 high-protein). The control group was instructed to consume their habitual diet; however, the high-protein group was instructed to consume >2.2 grams of protein per kilogram body weight daily (g/kg/d). Body composition was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Subjects were instructed to keep a food diary via the mobile app MyFitnessPal®. Results. During the 6-month treatment period, there was a significant difference in protein intake between the control and high-protein groups (control: 1.5±0.3, high-protein: 2.8±1.1 g/kg/d); however, there were no differences in the consumption total calories, carbohydrate or fat. Furthermore, there were no changes in any measure of body composition (i.e., lean body mass, fat mass, bone mineral content, bone mineral density, and body fat %). Conclusion. Despite an 87% higher protein intake (high-protein versus control), 6 months of a high-protein diet had no effect on any measures of bone health or body composition.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know