General and Mental Health of Arab-Americans Living in the United States: A Systematic Review of The Literature
2018
- 20Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage20
- Abstract Views20
Poster Description
Objective: This review aims to summarize the sparse peer-reviewed literature concerned with the health of Arab Americans (AAs) in the US. Background. The scientific literature on AAs has been limited due to some extent to the invisibility of AAs based on their identification as “White” in Census data and elsewhere. Attention to this population has increased with current political events, yet limited research addresses the health and well-being of AAs in the US. Methods. a systematic review of studies published between 2008 and 2017 was conducted via PubMed and MEDLINE. The search was limited to English-language studies. Keywords used for the search included the following: Arab Americans, Middle Eastern, minor ethnicity, health, mental health and general well-being. We limited our review to these years to reflect current thinking about the relation between ethnicity and health. Result. The original search provided 74 publications of which 42 were excluded because they were not measuring general health or mental health outcomes. Therefore, 31 studies were included in this review. Nine studies concerned with the AAs’ general mental health outcomes. Four studies addressed depression status in AAs. Three studies mentioned anxiety and mood of this population. Post-traumatic stress disorders were measured in seven different studies. Finally, eight studies measured general health status. Conclusion. The paucity of published studies on the health of AAs in the US highlights the overall lack of knowledge of this population at the public health level.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know