Seizure Prediction in Epilepsy Patients
2022
- 155Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage155
- Downloads118
- Abstract Views37
Artifact Description
Purpose/Objective: Characterize rigorously the preictal period in epilepsy patients to improve the development of seizure prediction techniques. Background/Rationale: 30% of epilepsy patients are not well-controlled on medications and would benefit immensely from reliable seizure prediction. Methods/Methodology: Computational model consisting of in-silico Hodgkin-Huxley neurons arranged in a small-world topology using the Watts-Strogatz algorithm is used to generate synthetic electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals. ECoG data from 18 epilepsy patients is used to validate the model. Unsupervised machine learning is used with both patient and synthetic data to identify potential electrophysiologic biomarkers of the preictal period. Results/Findings: The model has shown states corresponding to interictal and ictal periods in synthetic ECoG signals. Validation against patient ECoG data is in progress. Conclusions: This research has the potential to rigorously characterize the preictal period, with the possibility of identifying electrophysiologic biomarkers of the preictal period. Interprofessional Implications: Success of this research project would provide insights into the neurobiology of ictogenesis and would assist neurologists and neurosurgeons in providing improved treatment options for patients with refractory epilepsy. References: Mormann, F., Andrzejak, R.G., Elger, C.E., and Lehnertz, K. (2007). Seizure prediction: the long and winding road. Brain 130:314–333. Mormann, F. and Andrzejak, R.G. (2016). Seizure prediction: making mileage on the long and winding road. Brain 139(Pt 6):1625-1627. Nemzer, L.R., Cravens, G.D., Worth, R.M., Motta, F., Placzek, A., Castro, V., and Lou, J.Q. (2021). Critical and ictal phases in simulated EEG signals on a small-world network. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 14:583350, doi: 10.3389/fncom.2020.583350.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know