Quantifying Instructional Interventions in Pediatric Physical therapy with the Motor Teaching Strategies Coding Instrument (MTSCI-1): A Pilot Study
Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, Vol: 5, Issue: 1
2007
- 790Usage
- 34Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage790
- Downloads578
- Abstract Views212
- Captures34
- Readers34
- 34
Article Description
Purpose: This paper presents the development and preliminary psychomotor testing of a new instrument, the Motor Teaching Strategies Coding Instrument (MTSCI-1), designed to quantitatively assess motor-teaching strategies used by physical therapists during therapeutic interventions with children. Method: The MTSCI-1 was developed to evaluate the use of strategies grounded in motor learning theories and concepts. The items were generated from a review of the literature. To evaluate reliability, two physical therapists used the MTSCI-1 to code videotaped treatment sessions of pediatric physical therapists. Kappa was calculated. Validation was examined by comparing scores of physical therapists with different years of experience. Results: The resulting instrument had two main sections: (a) task/movement characteristics, and (b) before-, during- and after-task strategies. Each activity trial was analyzed and frequency of strategies used was determined. Percentage of agreement and preliminary inter- and intra-rater reliability (κ=.66-.94) as well as content and construct validation were established. The instrument differentiated the use of some strategies among groups of physical therapists with varied years of experience. Conclusions: The MTSCI-1 may be considered in research studies to document the motor-teaching strategies of physical therapists. The MTSCI-1 may also facilitate the learning and training of therapists from various fields in the application of motor learning to maximize clients’ outcomes from their motor-teaching activities.
Bibliographic Details
Nova Southeastern University
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know