Status of the Reefs in the Cayman Islands
2000
- 42Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage42
- Abstract Views42
Conference Paper Description
As with many of the reefs in the Caribbean, the reefs in the Caymans have been under continuous natural and anthropogenic stresses (80% of the corals on the walls were bleached in 1998). In June, 1999 the reefs around Little Cayman and Grand Cayman Islands were assessed using the AGRRA protocol at 33 sites. A total of 4521 corals in 330 transects, 1807 algal quadrats, and 341 fish transects were measured. Assessment and habitat data are presented in a GIS. The coral reefs of the two Cayman Islands appear to be in similar good condition but there are some differences. Differences include higher frequency and average cover of macroalgae and higher incidence of coral diseases on Little Cayman. Algal competition does not appear to be a problem for corals at most sites. Thirteen (87%) of the sites on Grand Cayman had standing dead coral and only 4 sites (22%) on Little Cayman. Recent coral mortality was twice as high on Grand Cayman as on Little Cayman (5.0% vs 2.1%). Coral recruitment was patchy, but present, mostly at low levels across the region. Live coral cover averaged 19.8 ± 3.3% on Grand Cayman and 23.2 ± 5.4% on Little Cayman. No old Acropora palmata stands occur, however, low density patchy new growth occurs frequently. The average abundance of fish was greater and the frequency of certain fish, especially grouper and snapper were up to eight times higher on Little Cayman. Grouper spawning aggregations are still harvested in the Cayman Islands.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know