Evaluation of Utility Relocation Costs and Best Management Practices
2010
- 4,186Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage4,186
- Downloads4,106
- 4,106
- Abstract Views80
Thesis / Dissertation Description
In recent years, the SCDOT has experienced a significant variation in estimated costs for the relocation of utilities on many projects. This has led to cost overruns and caused concerns for the district engineers responsible for the projects. Through meetings with SCDOT personnel and utility company representatives it was determined that a standardized cost estimate form combined with improved change order management and cost management strategies was needed. Recently submitted estimates were analyzed and rated by a panel on multiple criteria to generate a list of 'poor', 'good', and 'excellent' estimates. The 'excellent' estimates provided insight into the development of a standard estimate form and the deficiencies noted in all of the estimates were addressed in the standard form. The standardized cost estimate form should be simple, easy to use, and flexible for use on all types of utility relocation projects. An Excel spreadsheet was developed with line items for material, labor, and overhead costs. It is recommended that all utility companies on all utility relocation cost estimates submitted to the SCDOT use this format. This report presents five separate standardized estimate forms for power, communication, gas, water, and sanitary sewer utilities. This report also makes recommendations for improvements to the SCDOT's cost management database while utilizing cost management best practices. The main suggestion to improve the overall cost management process is to transition to a professional project management software such as Primavera P6 that can work seamlessly with the standardized estimate forms presented in this report, manage planned versus actual costs, search and sort data by any field, and generate useful cost and schedule reports.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know