Session 4: Financial/Methods - Estimating the Quantile Elasticity of Intertemporal Substitution with Instrumental Variables Quantile Regression
2018
- 14Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage14
- Abstract Views14
Artifact Description
estimate the quantile elasticity of intertemporal substitution (QEIS) of consumption using instrumental variables quantile regression. The elasticity of intertemporal substitution represents the willingness of a consumer to substitute future consumption for present consumption. In this paper, agents have a quantile utility preference instead of standard expected utility. This allows for the capture of heterogeneity along the conditional distribution of agents. The QEIS considers structural breaks in the data and is estimated for each regime using linearized Epstein-Zin preferences and by the use of fixed effects, instrumental variables, and quantile regression. The estimator is a feasible estimator based on smoothed sample moments. In order to estimate the model, the Nielsen Consumer Panel dataset is used. This dataset is built from transactional data that follows households in the United States and their grocery purchases from 2004 through 2014. Because of the transactional nature of the dataset, there is a low source of measurement error in consumption, and aggregation bias can be minimized. To estimate the model, consumption is aggregated weekly, and consumption growth is measured over a four-week time period in order to match four-week Treasury bills. Results give evidence of heterogeneity of the QEIS along the quantiles of the conditional distribution.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know