Session 8: Ensemble of Score Likelihood Ratios for the common source problem
2023
- 78Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage78
- Downloads46
- Abstract Views32
Interview Description
Machine learning-based Score Likelihood Ratios have been proposed as an alternative to traditional Likelihood Ratios and Bayes Factor to quantify the value of evidence when contrasting two opposing propositions.Under the common source problem, the opposing proposition relates to the inferential problem of assessing whether two items come from the same source. Machine learning techniques can be used to construct a (dis)similarity score for complex data when developing a traditional model is infeasible, and density estimation is used to estimate the likelihood of the scores under both propositions.In practice, the metric and its distribution are developed using pairwise comparisons constructed from a sample of the background population. Generating these comparisons results in a complex dependence structure violating assumptions fundamental to most methods.To remedy this lack of independence, we introduce a sampling approach to construct training and estimation sets where assumptions are met. Using these newly created datasets, we construct multiple base SLR systems and aggregate their information into a final score to quantify the value of evidence.Our experimental results show that this ensembled SLR can outperform traditional SLR in terms of the rate of misleading evidence, discriminatory power and show they are more reliable.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know