Loan Portfolio and Performance of Bank Holding Companies in the US: 2006-2008
2009
- 259Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage259
- Abstract Views147
- Downloads112
Article Description
The paper examines loan portfolio of bank holding companies in the US during the years 2006-2008 to identify any significant differences in bank lending before and during the financial crisis. The results of the study suggest that for the largest banks there was no significant change in loan portfolio throughout 2006-8. However, for small banks, the share of real estate loans slightly increased in 2008 where as the share of consumer loans declined suggesting some possible substitution of consumer loans by real estate loans. The study also examines the relationship between loan types and overall performance of bank holding companies in order to identify any significant difference in the effect of loan on bank profitability between the years 2006, 2007 and 2008. The empirical evidence suggests that higher aggregate loans were consistently associated with lower bank performance throughout 2006-08 where as evidence for the varying effect of loan portfolio on performance throughout 2006-08 is limited.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know