All Politics Is (Not) Local: The Structure of Lobbying in North Carolina
2009
- 589Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage589
- Downloads397
- Abstract Views192
Article Description
As North Carolina becomes more enmeshed in the national and global economy, the local political context might reflect more extra-local ties. Lobbying organizations in the state have significant ties to out-of-state firms, particularly those with offices in Washington, D.C. Examining the structure of lobbying relationships in one state, North Carolina, in terms of both lobbyist-to-client relations and inter-lobbyist relations such as through common clients, this paper assesses the level of relations between local and out-of-state firms. Using social network and standard statistical analysis as well as lobbying data from North Carolina, adjoining states, and federal lobbying data from the U.S. Senate, this project is not only focused on the state level but also on relations between local and national firms. To the best of our knowledge, little research has explored the connections between special interests represented at both the national and state levels. We find that a significant number of lobbying organizations engage in lobbying at the federal level as well as the state level. Moreover, the structure of relations among lobbying organizations appear to exhibit a truncated scale-free distribution of ties in which a small number of organizations garner the majority of ties. Organizations that represent other organizations (as opposed to representing themselves) and that operate at the federal and state levels seem to be the critical nodes in terms of the structure of the overall network.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know