Foucault on the case: the pastoral and juridical foundation of medical power.
The Journal of medical humanities, ISSN: 1041-3545, Vol: 25, Issue: 4, Page: 271-290
2004
- 17Citations
- 6Usage
- 31Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef5
- Usage6
- Abstract Views6
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
Article Description
This paper employs Foucault's concept of "governmentality" to examine critically the efforts by medical humanists to reform the medical case. I argue that these reform efforts contribute to the individualizing dimensions of medical power through the development of a "pastoral" technique that medicine has taken over from religious authority. Clinical experiences at this NEH Institute also revealed a juridical dimension of the medical case that treats a patient's statements as suspect and in need of corroboration by evidence provided by the patient's body. The combination of these pastoral and juridical dimensions of the case contributes to the normalizing power of modern medicine, and medical humanists need to be aware of their own contribution to this form of power as they reform the case.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=13944264347&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10912-004-4833-z; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15666081; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10912-004-4833-z; https://openworks.wooster.edu/facpub/200; https://openworks.wooster.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1202&context=facpub; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10912-004-4833-z; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s10912-004-4833-z; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10912-004-4833-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10912-004-4833-z
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know