Augmentation Of The Functional Independence Measure To Develop A Discharge Plan For A Patient Status Post Right Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Report
2019
- 54Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage54
- Abstract Views54
Poster Description
Background and Purpose: Comprehensive components of discharge planning have not been reported in the literature. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is often utilized as a functional outcome measure in the inpatient rehabilitation setting that can be utilized for discharge planning. The purpose of this case report is to describe limitations of the FIM and to identify functional measures that augmented the FIM for discharge planning for a patient status post right TKA.Case description: This patient was a 47-year-old African-American male who was admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation hospital after undergoing a right TKA. He had many comorbidities and health complications which increased his length of stay in the rehabilitation hospital, and the hospital where he had undergone TKA.Discussion: Gait distance, stair negotiation, and physical assistance needed for these tasks were outcomes measured by the FIM that were able to indicate that the patient could function safely at home. However, variables as described above such as gait speed, distance ambulated before needing a rest break, use of assistive devices/hand rails for stair negotiation, all represent safety considerations that aren’t represented by the FIM for safe community mobility. He also may have been at risk for falls as measured by the 5 Times Sit to Stand Test, and could potentially have challenges with hemodynamic stability during prolonged standing tasks as required for multiple ADLs, all of which were not represented by the FIM. It may be beneficial to utilize other functional outcome measures to augment the FIM to formulate robust discharge considerations.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know