Evidence of Abnormal Trading on COVID-19 Pfizer Vaccine Development Information
Journal of Risk and Financial Management, ISSN: 1911-8074, Vol: 15, Issue: 7
2022
- 5Citations
- 29Usage
- 25Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef4
- Usage29
- Abstract Views29
- Captures25
- Readers25
- 25
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent Blog
JRFM, Vol. 15, Pages 299: Evidence of Abnormal Trading on COVID-19 Pfizer Vaccine Development Information
JRFM, Vol. 15, Pages 299: Evidence of Abnormal Trading on COVID-19 Pfizer Vaccine Development Information Journal of Risk and Financial Management doi: 10.3390/jrfm15070299 Authors: Andrew
Article Description
The 2019 COVID-19 pandemic led to an economic slowdown worldwide and shook the investment world. Pharmaceutical investments were influenced by the anticipation of COVID-19 vaccine developments. Our study examines the real-time impact of public announcements concern-ing COVID-19 vaccine developments on stock returns and volatilities for Pfizer, Moderna, and the S&P 500. Market Return and Information Event methodology were used to analyze stock activities immediately before important public COVID-19 vaccine development announcements related to Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. This methodology was employed for vaccine news announcements between 2 January 2020 and 4 March 2022. Stock returns and volatility were analyzed with time-series regression analysis. Findings demonstrated that increased trade volatilities occurred immediately prior to COVID-19 vaccine development news was made public. Specifically, Pfizer stock returns were significantly higher (above the mean) immediately before positive COVID-19 vaccine development information was made public. Also, increased volume volatility was observed for Pfizer, Moderna, and the S&P 500 index stocks immediately before positive vaccine development information con-cerning Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were made public. These findings suggest that the vaccine information may have been leaked before being made public. If so, the findings may indicate that investors were taking advantage of insider information while trying to mitigate the appearance that they engaged in insider trading.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85134050297&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15070299; https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/7/299; https://orc.library.atu.edu/faculty_pub_bus/82; https://orc.library.atu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1081&context=faculty_pub_bus; https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15070299
MDPI AG
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know