Choosing the Right CEO
2017
- 29Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage29
- Abstract Views28
- Downloads1
Project Description
This paper is an application of HDM (Hierarchical Decision Modeling) model to select the CEO Chief Executive Office of a well-established startup company, Company X in today’s technologically challenging, diverse and highly transparent environment. CEO is face of the Organization, the one responsible for all the day to day management decisions and acts as a direct liaison between the Board and Management of the Company. Hence it is very important for the Board to choose the right CEO. HDM model helps make a scientific and empirical decision basing on the board’s preferences. The inputs to the HDM model are derived from literature review and the profiles of the candidates. The HDM model takes the weights assigned by the Board of seven members, which here will be the expert panel. Further sensitivity analysis is done to check for consistency in the model. Candidate 1 was selected as the best Candidate as CEO from the model. Candidate 2 weighted the least. With the time and resource constraints along with the experts that are reachable, this study is compact. This study can also conducted on a bigger scale and involving more diverse experts and board members who have had made these decisions in the past. Future research can be conducted to make this study more elaborate.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know