Unpacking Producer / Consumer Relationships in Ethical Markets: A Look at Portland's DIY Sector
2013
- 164Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage164
- Downloads104
- Abstract Views60
Lecture / Presentation Description
This presentation analyzes ethical consumption practices in alternative markets with a sector-specific focus evaluation of indicators and impacts. The paper reviews qualitative research conducted on Portland’s artisan economy with a focus on the independent or do-it-yourself (DIY) craft sector and presents follow up methods. General findings demonstrate ways market perceptions of sector participants reveal value-driven practices, illustrate impacts on production (through the role of place), and highlight impacts of market practices on producer accountability and consumer choices. Specific findings indicate drivers of the DIY market include integrity of production and consumption, communitarian values, minimal concern about competition, and attitudes of resistance to economic globalization with emphasis on alternatives to Fordist production processes in the context of consumer identity. Enabling characteristics include high producer/ consumer access to alternative markets, civic policies, cost of living, neighborhood culture, and collaboration with other artisan sectors and creative industries. Risks facing this sector include co-optation or imitation from mass-scale producers, temptation to sacrifice DIY values for increased profit, as well as debatable determination of its alternativeness. These findings have implications for further research which looks at ethical consumerism within place-based contexts, considers impacts and limits of ethical markets, examines equitable access to ethical markets, and explores implications for civic policies. Ultimately, the paper considers factors to determine effectiveness of ethical markets in the context of how to identify effective campaigns of ethical consumerism or how to validate exchange as an alternative to globalization.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know