Occupational safety during interventions in confined spaces
Safety Science, ISSN: 0925-7535, Vol: 79, Page: 19-28
2015
- 55Citations
- 2Usage
- 136Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations55
- Citation Indexes53
- 53
- CrossRef9
- Policy Citations2
- 2
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
- Captures136
- Readers136
- 136
Article Description
The aim of this study was to examine how organizations in Quebec manage risks associated with confined space interventions. Fatal work accidents that occurred in confined spaces in Quebec between 1998 and 2011 were therefore studied using the database of the provincial workers’ compensation board. Thirty-two accident investigation reports involving 40 fatalities were obtained for the target period. The risk factors studied were the time of year, type of accident, and management and design problems. The risk management practices of 15 Quebec organizations were also analyzed through semi-structured interviews and observation of confined space interventions. Organizations with different profiles were chosen to cover a wide range of confined spaces and work situations. With respect to the regulatory in force in Quebec and based on the Canadian standard on the management of work in confined spaces, the organizations visited neglected the following points, in terms of both prescribed directives and actual practices: (i) management of subcontractors, (ii) auditing how risk reduction means are used, and (iii) integration of prevention through design. The lack of guidelines limited the real effectiveness of measures pertaining to training, rescue, use of certain control measures, and the preparation of entry permits. Given the complexity and diversity of the work involved in the issuance of permits, uncertainties during their preparation can lead to poor risk assessment and eventually to inadequate risk reduction measures. This article therefore proposes an entry permit consolidating all the information needed to prepare for entry, as well as recommendations regarding the aforementioned challenges.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753515001241; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.05.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84930675954&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925753515001241; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0925753515001241?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0925753515001241?httpAccept=text/plain; https://pharesst.irsst.qc.ca/etudes-primaires/43; https://pharesst.irsst.qc.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1042&context=etudes-primaires; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.05.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know