Assessment of problem-solving therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy and an SSRI in the treatment of a single subject presenting with major depressive disorder and dysthymia
2002
- 221Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage221
- Downloads184
- Abstract Views37
Thesis / Dissertation Description
After diagnosis, a review of the literature was conducted to determine empirically supported treatments for depression. Based upon this review, this study examined and evaluated the effectiveness of various treatments determined in the current literature to be the best practice in treating depression in adults. The subject was a 44 year old Caucasian woman who initiated treatment voluntarily following a referral made by her primary care physician. This study was conducted in a community-based agency. A diagnosis of depression and dysthymia was reached through an initial intake interview and use of the DSM-IV. Best practice methodology was determined through an extensive review of the literature and feasible methods were utilized in treating this subject. Cognitive-behavioral therapy techniques, as well as problem-solving therapy techniques were utilized in conjunction with Zoloft, an antidepressant medication. Outcomes were measured by scores on the Beck Depression Inventory, the Bums Depression Checklist, the Ways of Coping Questionnaire, and a Consumer Satisfaction Inventory was included. Her scores were greatly improved at termination, with the BDI scores no longer falling in the depressed range. Her scores on the coping inventory had improved significantly as well. She reported decreased crying and decreased isolative behavior.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know