Legal barriers to implementing recommendations for universal, routine prenatal HIV testing
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, ISSN: 1073-1105, Vol: 32, Issue: 1, Page: 137-147
2004
- 10Citations
- 3Usage
- 17Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef5
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Usage3
- Abstract Views3
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Review Description
A 1999 Institute of Medicine (IOM) panel recommended that universal HIV testing become a routine component of prenatal care to reduce mother-to-child HIV transmission by enabling HIV-infected women to take advantage of antiretroviral prophylaxis. In this paper, we first evaluate the IOM's recommendations and the reasons behind them. We make specific recommendations regarding information that must be disclosed prior to prenatal HIV testing and legal protections that should be adopted. Our recommendations will help to ensure that wider prenatal HIV testing can be carried out without leaving women too vulnerable to psychosocial harms.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=2942679495&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00459.x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15152437; http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2004.tb00459.x; http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2004.tb00459.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1748-720X.2004.tb00459.x; https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1073110500007439/type/journal_article; https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/faculty_pub/855; https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1854&context=faculty_pub
SAGE Publications
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know