Mindful and Authentic: Examining Leaders’ Impact on the Feedback Environment
2022
- 207Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage207
- Downloads169
- Abstract Views38
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The majority of what is currently known about mindfulness at work focuses on the individual benefits of being mindful (see Glomb, Duffy, Bono, & Yang, 2011; Good, et al., 2016), leaving an opportunity to understand the interpersonal impact of mindfulness at work. The current study tested whether mindful individuals, specifically mindful leaders, impact the work experience of their direct reports. Building on initial evidence (Leroy et al., 2015; Nubold, Quaquebeke, & Hulsheger, 2019) and strong theoretical ties (Kernis, 2002), supervisor mindfulness was a significant predictor of direct reports’ perception of authentic leadership behavior. Empathy was tested as a positive other-directed emotion that drives the perceptions of authentic behavior. Direct reports’ perceptions of supervisor empathy displayed a significant relationship, whereas supervisors self-rated empathy did not, suggesting it is the display of empathic concern that is important to direct reports’ ratings of authentic leader behavior rather than leaders’ selfperceptions of empathy. While positive interpersonal outcomes of mindful and authentic leaders have been theorized (Reb et al., 2015), impacts to coaching and the feedback environment had yet to be tested. The current study found evidence that mindful, authentic leaders promote a favorable feedback environment via the development of quality coaching relationships with their direct reports.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know