Firm Use of Cybersecurity Risk Disclosures
Journal of Information Systems, ISSN: 1558-7959, Vol: 36, Issue: 1, Page: 151-180
2022
- 11Citations
- 54Usage
- 33Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- CrossRef4
- Usage54
- Abstract Views54
- Captures33
- Readers33
- 33
Article Description
Increasingly, firms are subject to rising cybersecurity risks. One way that firms can communicate cybersecurity uncertainty and reduce information asymmetry with external stakeholders is through cybersecurity risk disclosures. SEC (2011, 2018) guidance encourages the disclosure of significant cybersecurity risk factors. However, not all firms provide informative or quality disclosures following a cybersecurity breach event. In this study, we examine firms’ use of cybersecurity risk disclosures after a cybersecurity breach. We find that not all breached firms alter their cybersecurity disclosure behavior similarly following a breach. Rather, firm prior breach experience and breach-related market reactions impact the provision of additional cybersecurity disclosures. Our study provides initial evidence on when firms provide additional cybersecurity disclosures post-breach and informs regulators and policymakers on how firms utilize cybersecurity risk disclosures as a response behavior.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85134658941&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/isys-2020-067; https://publications.aaahq.org/jis/article/36/1/151/995/Firm-Use-of-Cybersecurity-Risk-Disclosures; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/accounting_pubs/11; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=accounting_pubs; https://repository.lsu.edu/accounting_pubs/11; https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=accounting_pubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.2308/isys-2020-067
American Accounting Association
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know