A comparison of ionic liquids to molecular organic solvents as additives for chiral separations in micellar electrokinetic chromatorgraphy
Journal of Separation Science, ISSN: 1615-9306, Vol: 30, Issue: 9, Page: 1334-1342
2007
- 30Citations
- 37Usage
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations30
- Citation Indexes30
- 30
- CrossRef27
- Usage37
- Downloads37
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Article Description
In this study, we report the effects of adding ionic liquids (ILs), as compared to adding conventional molecular organic solvents (MOSs), to aqueous buffer solutions containing molecular micelles in the separation of chiral analyte mixtures in micellar EKC (MEKC). The molecular micelle used in this study was polysodium oleyl-L-leucylvalinate (poly-L-SOLV). The ILs were 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, where the alkyl group was ethyl, butyl, hexyl, or octyl. These ILs were chosen due to their hydrophobicity, good solvating, and electrolyte properties. Thus, it was expected that these ILs would have favorable interactions with chiral analytes and not adversely affect the background current. Common CE buffers, mixed with a molecular micelle, and an IL or a MOS, were used for these chiral separations. The buffers containing an IL in the concentration range of 0.02-0.1 v/v were found to support a reasonable current when an electric field strength of 500 V/cm was applied across the capillary. However, a current break down was observed for the buffers containing more than 60% v/v MOS on application of the above-mentioned electric field. The chiral resolution and selectivity of the analytes were dependent on the concentration and type of IL or MOS used. © 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34250824026&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200600455; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17623476; https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jssc.200600455; https://repository.lsu.edu/chemistry_pubs/2595; https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3596&context=chemistry_pubs; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/chemistry_pubs/2595; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3596&context=chemistry_pubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200600455; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/jssc.200600455; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jssc.200600455; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jssc.200600455; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jssc.200600455; https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jssc.200600455; https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jssc.200600455; https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jssc.200600455
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know