Infrared laser ablation sample transfer of tissue DNA for genomic analysis
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, ISSN: 1618-2650, Vol: 409, Issue: 17, Page: 4119-4126
2017
- 9Citations
- 7Usage
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef8
- Usage7
- Abstract Views7
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
Infrared (IR) laser ablation was used to remove material from tissue sections mounted on microscope slides, with subsequent capture in a solvent-containing microcentrifuge tube. Experiments conducted with a 3200-bp double-stranded plasmid DNA template demonstrated IR-laser ablation transfer of intact DNA. The transfer efficiency and the molecular integrity of the captured DNA were evaluated using Sanger sequencing, gel electrophoresis, and fluorimetric analysis. The plasmid DNA was reproducibly transferred with an efficiency of 59 ± 3% at laser fluences of between 10 and 20 kJ/m at a wavelength of 3 μm. IR laser ablation sample transfer was then used to ablate and capture DNA from 50-μm-thick rat brain and kidney tissue sections. DNA was extracted from the captured material using five commercial DNA extraction kits that employed significantly divergent methodologies, with all kits recovering sufficient DNA for successful amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Four sets of primers were employed, targeting one region of the CYP 11b2 gene (376 bp) and three different regions of the Snn1g gene (298, 168, and 281 bp). The PCR results were not consistently reliable when using unpurified ablation samples; however, after extraction, all samples produced PCR products of the expected size. This work expands the sampling capabilities of IR laser ablation, demonstrating that DNA can be isolated from tissue samples for genomic assays. Due to the small size of the ablation regions (1 mm), this technique will be useful for sampling discrete cell populations from tissue sections. [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
Bibliographic Details
https://repository.lsu.edu/chemistry_pubs/966; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/chemistry_pubs/966; https://repository.lsu.edu/biosci_pubs/4319
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85019259335&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0373-z; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28512717; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00216-017-0373-z; https://repository.lsu.edu/chemistry_pubs/966; https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1966&context=chemistry_pubs; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/chemistry_pubs/966; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1966&context=chemistry_pubs; https://repository.lsu.edu/biosci_pubs/4319; https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5325&context=biosci_pubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0373-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00216-017-0373-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00216-017-0373-z; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00216-017-0373-z.pdf; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00216-017-0373-z.pdf
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know