Sensitivity Analysis of Factors Affecting Decision-Making for a Housing Energy Retrofit: A Case Study
Construction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan - Proceedings of the 2016 Construction Research Congress, CRC 2016, Page: 1254-1263
2016
- 7Citations
- 1Usage
- 18Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef2
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
- Captures18
- Readers18
- 18
Conference Paper Description
In the United States, over 60% of the housing inventory is more than 30 years old. One way to improve energy efficiency of those aged buildings is through housing retrofits. One of the main challenges of housing retrofit projects is making the decision about the amount of investment that results in maximum long-time benefits. In terms of life-cycle cost for a housing retrofit, different factors may affect the type of retrofitting alternatives to be implemented in the project. This research first introduces an optimization model for decision-making in housing retrofit. The model incorporates the use of genetic algorithm for selecting the optimum retrofitting plan based on the minimum life-cycle cost of the building. Then using a case study through this research a sensitivity analysis is performed to evaluate the impact of different factors such as service life of the building, homeowner's available budget, and discount rate of the building location on the suggested optimum retrofitting alternatives. The initial results illustrate that the retrofitting efforts could be more feasible when the service life of the building is high and the amount of discount rate is low. The results can help homeowners to make a more accurate decision for a housing energy retrofit.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84976346929&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784479827.126; http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/9780784479827.126; http://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/9780784479827.126; https://repository.lsu.edu/construction_management_pubs/190; https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1190&context=construction_management_pubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784479827.126; https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/9780784479827.126
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know