'Living cantilever arrays' for characterization of mass of single live cells in fluids
Lab on a Chip, ISSN: 1473-0189, Vol: 8, Issue: 7, Page: 1034-1041
2008
- 112Citations
- 2Usage
- 164Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations112
- Citation Indexes112
- 112
- CrossRef110
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
- Captures164
- Readers164
- 164
Article Description
The size of a cell is a fundamental physiological property and is closely regulated by various environmental and genetic factors. Optical or confocal microscopy can be used to measure the dimensions of adherent cells, and Coulter counter or flow cytometry (forward scattering light intensity) can be used to estimate the volume of single cells in a flow. Although these methods could be used to obtain the mass of single live cells, no method suitable for directly measuring the mass of single adherent cells without detaching them from the surface is currently available. We report the design, fabrication, and testing of 'living cantilever arrays', an approach to measure the mass of single adherent live cells in fluid using silicon cantilever mass sensor. HeLa cells were injected into microfluidic channels with a linear array of functionalized silicon cantilevers and the cells were subsequently captured on the cantilevers with positive dielectrophoresis. The captured cells were then cultured on the cantilevers in a microfluidic environment and the resonant frequencies of the cantilevers were measured. The mass of a single HeLa cell was extracted from the resonance frequency shift of the cantilever and was found to be close to the mass value calculated from the cell density from the literature and the cell volume obtained from confocal microscopy. This approach can provide a new method for mass measurement of a single adherent cell in its physiological condition in a non-invasive manner, as well as optical observations of the same cell. We believe this technology would be very valuable for single cell time-course studies of adherent live cells. © The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=46149114366&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b803601b; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18584076; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=b803601b; https://repository.lsu.edu/eecs_pubs/1160; https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2162&context=eecs_pubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b803601b; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2008/lc/b803601b; http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=b803601b; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2008/lc/b803601b; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2008/lc/b803601b; http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2008/LC/b803601b; http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2008/LC/B803601B; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2008/LC/b803601b
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know