MMSE interference suppression in MIMO frequency selective and time-varying fading channels
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, ISSN: 1053-587X, Vol: 56, Issue: 8 I, Page: 3638-3651
2008
- 21Citations
- 1Usage
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations21
- Citation Indexes21
- 21
- CrossRef14
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Article Description
Multiple-input/multiple-output (MIMO) frequency selective fading channels introduce both the intersymbol interference (ISI) and the inter-(sub)channel interference (ICI) that are the major performance limiting factors for MIMO wireless data communications. This paper focuses on joint suppression of such two interferences in receiver design under the criterion of the minimum mean-squared error (MMSE). The well-known Kalman filtering arises as a natural design tool to achieve the optimum joint suppression of the ISI and ICI in the sense of MMSE that results in a two-stage design method that suppresses the ISI and ICI in series. Specifically, a state-space solution is derived for the optimum decision-feedback equalizer (DFE) based on temporal Kalman filtering, and is shown to be equivalent to a conventional finite length DFE for ISI suppression. A novel spatial Kalman filtering scheme is proposed as the second stage to successively cancel the ICI. It is shown that the proposed two-stage method yields the realizable and optimum joint ISI and ICI suppression, while it admits lower computational complexity than the conventional finite length DFE for ISI suppression and the MMSE V-BLAST receiver for ICI suppression. The results are applicable to any linear channels that admit state-space realizations, including MIMO frequency selective time-varying channels, and are thus the most general. Simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed two-stage method and its robustness to channel estimation uncertainties that may arise in practical systems. © 2008 IEEE.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=48849086246&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2008.919389; http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4567654/; http://xplorestaging.ieee.org/ielx5/78/4567633/04567654.pdf?arnumber=4567654; https://repository.lsu.edu/eecs_pubs/292; https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1291&context=eecs_pubs
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know