Point-of-care testing (POCT) diagnostic systems using microfluidic lab-on-a-chip technologies
Microelectronic Engineering, ISSN: 0167-9317, Vol: 132, Page: 46-57
2015
- 428Citations
- 14Usage
- 803Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations428
- Citation Indexes425
- 425
- CrossRef322
- Patent Family Citations3
- 3
- Usage14
- Abstract Views14
- Captures803
- Readers803
- 803
Review Description
Point-of-care testing (POCT) is necessary to provide a rapid diagnostic result for a prompt on-site diagnosis and treatment. A quick analysis time and high sensitivity, with a sample-to-answer format, are the most important features for current POCT diagnostic systems. Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip technologies have been considered as one of the promising solutions that can meet the requirement of the POCT since they can miniaturize and integrate most of the functional modules used in central laboratories into a small chip. This review covers recent advances in POCT technologies with an emphasis on demonstrated and commercially available POCT diagnostic systems with laboratory quality using microfluidic lab-on-a-chip technologies. As working principles and required functional modules depend on target analytes, we categorize the applications of the POCT diagnostic systems according to the analyte types such as proteins, cells, nucleic acids, and metabolites. In each analyte category, detection methods, configuration of POCT lab-on-a-chip modules, and advantages and disadvantages of POCT systems are reviewed and discussed along with future prospects.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167931714004316; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2014.09.024; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84908361222&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167931714004316; https://repository.lsu.edu/eecs_pubs/52; https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=eecs_pubs; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/eecs_pubs/52; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=eecs_pubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2014.09.024
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know