Multitarget Joint Delay and Doppler-Shift Estimation in Bistatic Passive Radar
IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, ISSN: 1557-9603, Vol: 56, Issue: 3, Page: 1795-1806
2020
- 8Citations
- 3Usage
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef5
- Usage3
- Abstract Views3
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
We study the problem of jointly estimating the delays and Doppler shifts of multiple targets in a bistatic passive radar system when the unknown signal from the illuminator of opportunity (IO) is modeled as a correlated stochastic process. We treat all the delays and Doppler shifts as continuous-valued parameters to avoid straddle loss due to discretization. A computationally efficient method based on the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm is proposed, which breaks up the complex multidimensional maximum likelihood estimation problem into several separate optimization problems, one optimization per target. The algorithm provides estimates of all the targets' delays and Doppler shifts along with the estimate of the IO signal and each target's component signal in the surveillance channel. The Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) is also derived. Simulation results are presented, where we compare the proposed algorithm with the conventional cross-correlation (CC) estimator, modified CC (MCC) estimator, EM with successive interference cancellation (EM-SIC) estimator, and CRLB. It is shown that when the targets are well separated on the delay-Doppler shift plane, the proposed method outperforms all the estimators. Moreover, when the targets are close in this plane, the CC and EM-SIC estimators fails to distinguish the targets, whereas the proposed method successfully estimates the delays and Doppler shifts and outperforms the MCC in this case as well. Finally as the signal-To-noise ratio increases, the performance of the proposed method approaches that of the CRLB.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086590687&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/taes.2019.2936779; https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8809814/; https://repository.lsu.edu/eecs_pubs/996; https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1995&context=eecs_pubs
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know