Extensions of the Poisson Summation Formula
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, ISSN: 0022-247X, Vol: 218, Issue: 2, Page: 581-606
1998
- 11Citations
- 66Usage
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- CrossRef8
- Usage66
- Downloads63
- Abstract Views3
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
The classical Poisson summation formula (1.1) and the corresponding distributional formula (1.2) have found extensive applications in various scientific fields. However, they are not universally valid. For instance, if φ( x ) is a smooth function, the left-hand side of (1.1) is generally divergent. Even when both sides of (1.1) converge absolutely, they may do so to different numbers. Indeed, in Example 3 we are faced with the embarrassing situation where the series on the left-hand side of (1.1) converges for Re s > 1 while that on the right-hand side converges only for Re s < 0. Our aim is to extend formulas (1.1) and (1.2) with the help of some new results in distributional theory. For instance, the evaluation of the distribution with zero mean as given by (3.1) at a test function φ( x ) yields the relation ∑ ∞ −∞ φ( k ) − ∫ ∞ −∞ φ( x ) dx. Both the series and the integral in this expression are generally divergent. The concept of the Cesàro limit is then used to obtain the finite difference of these two terms. Thereafter we extend the analysis to higher dimensions. Various innovative examples are presented to illustrate these concepts.
Bibliographic Details
https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/mathematics_pubs/314; https://repository.lsu.edu/mathematics_pubs/314
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022247X9795767X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1997.5767; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0010344450&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022247X9795767X; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0022247X9795767X?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0022247X9795767X?httpAccept=text/plain; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/mathematics_pubs/314; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1313&context=mathematics_pubs; https://repository.lsu.edu/mathematics_pubs/314; https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1313&context=mathematics_pubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1997.5767
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know