Addressing the Clumsiness Loophole in a Leggett-Garg Test of Macrorealism
Foundations of Physics, ISSN: 0015-9018, Vol: 42, Issue: 2, Page: 256-265
2012
- 88Citations
- 55Usage
- 54Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations88
- Citation Indexes88
- 88
- CrossRef39
- Usage55
- Downloads55
- Captures54
- Readers54
- 54
- Mentions2
- References2
- 2
Article Description
The rise of quantum information theory has lent new relevance to experimental tests for non-classicality, particularly in controversial cases such as adiabatic quantum computing superconducting circuits. The Leggett-Garg inequality is a "Bell inequality in time" designed to indicate whether a single quantum system behaves in a macrorealistic fashion. Unfortunately, a violation of the inequality can only show that the system is either (i) non-macrorealistic or (ii) macrorealistic but subjected to a measurement technique that happens to disturb the system. The "clumsiness" loophole (ii) provides reliable refuge for the stubborn macrorealist, who can invoke it to brand recent experimental and theoretical work on the Leggett-Garg test inconclusive. Here, we present a revised Leggett-Garg protocol that permits one to conclude that a system is either (i) non-macrorealistic or (ii) macrorealistic but with the property that two seemingly non-invasive measurements can somehow collude and strongly disturb the system. By providing an explicit check of the invasiveness of the measurements, the protocol replaces the clumsiness loophole with a significantly smaller "collusion" loophole. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Bibliographic Details
https://repository.lsu.edu/physics_astronomy_pubs/5744; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/physics_astronomy_pubs/5744
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84856096422&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9598-4; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10701-011-9598-4; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10701-011-9598-4; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10701-011-9598-4.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10701-011-9598-4/fulltext.html; https://repository.lsu.edu/physics_astronomy_pubs/5744; https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6824&context=physics_astronomy_pubs; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/physics_astronomy_pubs/5744; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6824&context=physics_astronomy_pubs; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10701-011-9598-4; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s10701-011-9598-4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9598-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10701-011-9598-4; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10701-011-9598-4.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10701-011-9598-4; http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.1777; https://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.1777; https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.1777v4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know