Pandemic Learning: Remapping the Classroom Space
Vol: 6, Issue: 1
2021
- 148Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage148
- Downloads97
- Abstract Views51
Article Description
In her memoir, A Field Guide to Getting Lost, Rebecca Solnit writes, “Never to get lost is not to live, not to know how to get lost brings you to destruction, and somewhere in the terra incognita lies a life of discovery” (14). We have been living in something of a terra incognita—an unexplored, uncharted space—since the middle of March 2020. “Never to get lost is not to live,” Solnit says, but what happens when we are in a constant state of the unfamiliar? And what if we are confined to familiar spaces that must be remapped to accommodate different kinds of exploration? This paper—part personal and pedagogical reflection and part scholarly exploration of the ideological implications of space—considers how the pandemic and its safety protocols of masking and social distancing, sheltering in place and quarantining along with the tools of online learning have altered educational spaces and made the familiar unfamiliar. The resulting disorientation requires us to remap these spaces and find new tools of navigation in order to pursue the educational “life of discovery.”
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know