Restorative Justice, School Reopenings and Educational Equity: A Contemporary Mapping and Analysis of State Law
UC Davis Law Review Online, Vol: 55, Page: 43
2021
- 100Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage100
- Downloads91
- Abstract Views9
Article Description
The opportunity to use restorative justice practices to address structural inequalities and reimagine school structures has become increasingly important in the wake of twin social and public health pandemics. As research-based restorative practices continue to grow across the country with the aim of fostering supportive, safe, and anti-racist learning environments, calls to codify school-based restorative justice are spreading. Despite the prevalence of on-the-ground practices since the 1990s and a growing evidence base for school-based restorative practices, there is little understanding of the effect of the legalization of restorative justice on individual- or school-level outcomes. This study is the first analysis of the current school-based restorative justice schemes enshrined in state law. This data lays an important foundation for future directions in research, policy construction, and the use of restorative practices as education in the United States continues to transform following COVID-19 closures. To ensure that schools can best support the needs of students as they return to classrooms, close attention to the current restorative justice legal scheme is a key step to avoid practices and policies that could exacerbate long-standing systemic inequities in education. As schools rebuild their learning communities, future attention should focus on rigorous and systematic evaluation of restorative justice laws and how they can strengthen not only our educational system as a whole but also support educational achievement and healthy social and emotional development. Such studies will also promote new sociolegal understandings of the deployment of law as a core element of educational equity and justice movements, as well as enhance the evidence base for restorative justice in schools.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know