The Law That It Deems Applicable: ICANN, Dispute Resolution, and the Problem of Cybersquatting
Vol: 22, Issue: 3, Page: 453
2000
- 497Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage497
- Downloads470
- Abstract Views27
Article Description
In an attempt to resolve disputes between domain name registrants and trademark holders in various countries, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has implemented a policy under which complaints can be lodged and an objective inquiry into the facts for parties can be assessed. This article attempts to examine cases filed to date to determine whether the ICANN Policy and Rules are being effectively used for their intended purpose. The author explores the features of a domain name, the history of the Internet and how the decision to privatize the administration of domain names was made. Also examined are recommendations made by WIPO in regard to what they consider to be the best way of handling domain name disputes, the implementation of ICANN, and the creation of the dispute resolution process. Included is an assessment of whether the ICANN process provides a fair and objective forum in which both parties can be heard.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know