Reinforcing students' correlation comprehension
International Journal of Learning, Vol: 17, Issue: 11, Page: 261-274
2011
- 13Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage13
- Abstract Views13
Article Description
Graphical presentation of data provides a fast way of extracting information from data and is the primary method for illustrating complicated data structure, and thus facilitates the process of data examination. The graphical representation of data provides valuable clues to what and how further statistical work ought to be carried out because technically correct statistical graphics disclose significant elements of the information they represent and also serve as an alternative means of effective communication. Even though students who know how to draw statistical graphs and charts often fail to present data in proper graphical format and are unable to convey their thoughts about their findings from their graphical displays of data to their audience because they have difficulty gaining insights and seeing hidden relationships of data. This hinders the development of students' graphical understanding of scatterplots, a statistical topic taught in undergraduate study. In this paper we present a critical review of current research in this area from three different perspectives: pedagogy, statistics and cognitive psychology. Specifically, Curcio (1987) outlined a classification model of reading graphical data from a mathematics educator's perspective; Cook and Weisberg (1997) advocated a model of statistical graphing based on the statistician's viewpoint; while Carpenter and Shah (1998) developed their model of graphical comprehension and interpretation from a cognitive science position. Arising from our synthesis of this research we propose a cognitive model of correlation comprehension which helps statistics lecturers to structure undergraduate students' thought so as to reinforce their graphing capabilities when teaching how to solve correlation problems.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know