The Spillover Effects of Top Income Inequality
2017
- 158Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage158
- Abstract Views158
Artifact Description
Since the 1980s top income inequality (both the share of income held by top earners and inequality among them) has risen sharply. Common explanations for this phenomenon tend to rely on common shocks such as superstars effects, globalization, or technological progress that sharply increase the returns to being most talented. Yet these explanations struggle to explain increases in top income inequality for occupations where output is not easily scalable, such as doctors, dentists, and realtors. This project will show how an increase in top income inequality in some occupations can spill over to others through inequality in top earners' willingness to pay for quality. A theoretical model, in which doctors produce health services that are not divisible or scalable, leads to an equilibrium where the best doctors are matched with the richest individuals. This model will be tested using Census data on income inequality by profession and location, and medical claims data to examine inequality in the prices doctors charge for identical services. A Bartik-style instrument will allow me to obtain causal estimates of how general income inequality spills over into inequality for doctors and similar professions.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know