An evolutionary game theoretic perspective on e-collaboration: The collaboration effort and media relativeness
European Journal of Operational Research, ISSN: 0377-2217, Vol: 194, Issue: 3, Page: 821-833
2009
- 85Citations
- 3Usage
- 83Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations85
- Citation Indexes85
- 85
- CrossRef33
- Usage3
- Abstract Views3
- Captures83
- Readers83
- 83
Article Description
Studies of e-collaboration from a game-theoretical perspective are practically nonexistent. This article contributes to filling this gap by focusing on the strategic interaction between players as they decide whether and how much to collaborate with each other. We use evolutionary game theory to make predictions about a two-person e-collaboration game. More specifically, we extend the traditional Prisoners’ Dilemma and Snowdrift game theory notions to discrete-strategy e-collaboration games, by explicitly including social punishments into the players’ payoff functions. We also introduce continuous-strategy e-collaboration games with both complete and incomplete information. Finally, we provide two generic dynamic programming models for e-collaboration games with media selection.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221708001392; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.021; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=55149109249&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0377221708001392; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0377221708001392?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0377221708001392?httpAccept=text/plain; https://rio.tamiu.edu/arssb_facpubs/98; https://rio.tamiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1097&context=arssb_facpubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.021
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know