The Relationship Between Analytic vs. Creative Thinking in Conspiracy Theory Ideation
2018
- 314Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage314
- Abstract Views314
Artifact Description
There is a perception that only people who are “crazy” or illogical believe in things such as conspiracy theories. However, belief in conspiracy theories may be more common than we think. According to a Washington Post article written in 2015 by John Sides, as much as 40% of American citizens believe in at least one conspiracy theory. The purpose of the present study was to examine conspiracy theory ideation and to determine whether it is related to cognitive styles such as creative or analytical thinking, with. In the study, approximately 40 volunteers completed a short demographic questionnaire and a test for creative thinking to measure their predisposition for creative thinking. Participants were then randomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions: analytical or creative. Participants were then given either an analytical task or a creative task to complete for a period of 7 minutes. Finally, participants were then asked to complete a short survey about their belief in conspiracy theories as well as the General Conspiracist Belief Scale. While data are still being collected, based on prior research it is expected that those who score higher on the test of creative thinking and who were engaged in a creative task prior to completing the survey will be more likely to display a belief in conspiracy theories. At a time when rumors, claims of “fake news” and alleged secret agendas behind different disasters, learning more about what type of thinking promotes belief in conspiracy theories could help the public to be more objective as they evaluate stories in the news.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know