Contact Lens Prescribing Trends for Keratoconus at an Academic Medical Center: Increased Utilization of Scleral Lenses for Severe Disease
Eye and Contact Lens, ISSN: 1542-233X, Vol: 48, Issue: 2, Page: 58-62
2022
- 6Citations
- 8Usage
- 28Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef4
- Usage8
- Abstract Views8
- Captures28
- Readers28
- 28
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Reports from University of Illinois Add New Data to Findings in Keratoconus (Contact Lens Prescribing Trends for Keratoconus At an Academic Medical Center: Increased Utilization of Scleral Lenses for Severe Disease)
2022 NOV 08 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Health & Medicine Daily -- Current study results on Eye Diseases and Conditions
Conference Paper Description
Objectives:To describe contact lens prescription trends for patients with keratoconus.Methods:Demographics, corneal curvature, visual acuity, and type of contact lens prescribed were reviewed for all patients with keratoconus evaluated in the contact lens service in 2010 and 2020.Results:There were 292 patients in 2010 and 217 in 2020. In 2010, 69% were using corneal gas-permeable lenses (GP), 16% soft toric, 13% hybrid, and 2% soft sphere with no scleral lens (SL). In 2020, 60% were using corneal GP, 22% SL, 12% soft toric, 5% hybrid, and 1% soft sphere. Mean log of minimum angle of resolution visual acuities with manifest refraction were (represented in mean [SD, range]) 0.42 (0.33, 0-1.3) in 2010 and 0.35 (0.33, 0-1.6) in 2020 improving to 0.19 (0.18, 0-1.3; P≤0.01) and 0.13 (0.14, 0-0.60; P<0.01) with contact lenses. Mean keratometry measurement in patients using SLs was 53.0 diopters (D) (9.9, 42.1-84.5), which was steeper than 46.6 D in patient's using all other lens types in 2010 and 2020 (3.9, 40.9-57.9; P<0.01).Conclusions:Scleral lens prescription increased during the past decade; however, corneal GP lenses remain the most frequent lens prescribed for patients with keratoconus in this cohort. Despite being prescribed for patients with the most advanced disease, SLs provide good visual acuity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85123661761&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/icl.0000000000000869; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35058416; https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000869; https://scholar.rochesterregional.org/rrhpubs/1203; https://scholar.rochesterregional.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2203&context=rrhpubs
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know