Understanding Student Motivation to Engage in the Contents Under Pressure Digital Game
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, ISSN: 2367-3389, Vol: 389 LNNS, Page: 878-889
2022
- 10Usage
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage10
- Abstract Views10
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Conference Paper Description
Game-based learning is an effective tool for motivating engineering students to engage with difficult and often complex topics. Although some research has been conducted on how games elicit motivation, additional studies have been suggested. The proposed work leverages Keller’s ARCS-V theory to investigate how desire for a specific outcome within the process safety digital game Contents Under Pressure affects students’ satisfaction or dissatisfaction with their experience. It was observed that students play the game with a desire either to improve themselves for internal satisfaction or to reach a set external objective in terms of academic or career performance. Many students also played the game with the goal to achieve key outcomes as it relates to game-based metrics. Students expressed a mixture of satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the outcome obtained. Those who were satisfied were most often exhibiting behaviors of paragaming or were experiencing immersion in the game, whereas those students that showed dissatisfaction often blamed the game while expressing difficulties with achieving a positive outcome.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85124666152&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93904-5_86; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-93904-5_86; https://scholar.rose-hulman.edu/chemical_engineering_fac/191; https://scholar.rose-hulman.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1191&context=chemical_engineering_fac; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93904-5_86; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-93904-5_86
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know