Harmonic response of a layered halfspace using reduced finite element model with perfectly-matched layer boundaries
ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE), Vol: 13
2016
- 1Citations
- 2Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
Conference Paper Description
The current paper investigates the use of perfectly-matched layers (PML) as absorbing elements for a finite element (FE) model simulating a semi-infinite medium. This formulation is convenient for application of Craig-Bampton reduction (CBR), which significantly reduce the number active degrees-of-freedom in the model in an attempt to improve the computational efficiency. The results from this investigation suggest the PML elements worked seamlessly with the FE elements to approximate the elastodynamic response of a 2D layered halfspace subjected to a surface load; the wave energy appears to be fully absorbed by the PMLs regardless of incident angle or wavelength. The size of the model is reduced by approximately 77% using the CBR, which transforms the system into a mixed set of coordinates, including both modal and spatial coordinates. The model reduction is accomplished by neglecting modal frequencies for the system above one and a half times the maximum forcing frequency of interest. By only transforming the frequencyindependent FE section into modal coordinates, and leaving the frequency-dependent PML elements as spatial degrees-offreedom, the mode-shapes must only be solved once and can then be reused for different forcing frequencies. The results from this investigation suggest this could provide computational benefits if a number of cases are being computed for different frequencies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85021624714&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2016-65438; http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?doi=10.1115/IMECE2016-65438; https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IMECE/proceedings/IMECE2016/50671/Phoenix,%20Arizona,%20USA/262867; http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IMECE/proceedings-pdf/doi/10.1115/IMECE2016-65438/2498149/v013t01a015-imece2016-65438.pdf; https://scholar.rose-hulman.edu/mechanical_engineering_fac/531; https://scholar.rose-hulman.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1530&context=mechanical_engineering_fac; https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2016-65438
ASME International
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know