Evidence for multicontest eavesdropping in chickadees
Behavioral Ecology, ISSN: 1045-2249, Vol: 23, Issue: 4, Page: 836-842
2012
- 10Citations
- 61Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Animals eavesdrop on dyadic interactions between other individuals to gather information for future mate choice and territory defense decisions. The capacity for eavesdroppers to combine information gathered from overhearing multiple two-way interactions is poorly studied. We tested whether inexperienced (second year) and older (after second year) male black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) eavesdrop on rivals' song contests to evaluate the relative threat levels of multiple unfamiliar territorial intruders. We used a multiple speaker playback experiment to simulate 3 male territorial intruders (A, B, and C) engaging in 2 successive dyadic song contests, presenting focal males with the information that A was more threatening than B, and B was more threatening than C. We then assayed the response of focal males when presented with simulated intruders A and C without relative information. We predicted that males would defend against the intruder perceived to be the greater threat. Focal males initially responded toward the more threatening intruder (A) significantly more than the less threatening intruder (C), consistent with our predictions. Older birds approached the more threatening intruder (A) significantly more than the less threatening intruder (C), whereas young males showed more variable responses. Our results suggest that male chickadees were able to acquire relative threat information from separate song contests that influenced their responses toward rivals paired in novel contests. These findings indicate that territorial songbirds in communication networks may be capable of integrating information gathered through eavesdropping on multiple interactions. © 2012 The Author.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84862901731&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars038; http://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/23/4/836/222649/Evidence-for-multicontest-eavesdropping-in; http://academic.oup.com/beheco/article-pdf/23/4/836/14090933/ars038.pdf; https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/biologypub/384; https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars038; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars038; https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article-abstract/23/4/836/222649?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know