Navigation in electronic space: Users' learning strategies of word processing.
1991
- 50Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage50
- Downloads40
- Abstract Views10
Thesis / Dissertation Description
In communication research, there has been a lack of studies that investigated how people interact with technologies. As technologies become more complex, the issue of usage must also be addressed. Twenty-eight secretaries and support staff were given a word processing test to assess their level of proficiency. Out of this group, four novice and six advanced users were selected for non-directive interviewing. The study found that advanced and novice users shared very different thought worlds about word processing. Additionally, it was found that there were novices who displayed characteristics of advanced users and there were novices who tended to learn new word processing skills only when their work demanded them (minimally-involved novices). A new hypothesis was developed. The notions of advanced-novice users (ANUs) and novice-advanced users (NAUs) were suggested. The ANUs was defined as novices who displayed characteristics of advanced users. The NAUs was defined as experienced users who displayed characteristics of novice users. A Likert scale was constructed to test whether these two notions appeared valid. The results supported the hypothesis. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)Dept. of Communication Studies. Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses & Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis1991 .C4534. Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 31-01, page: 0457. Chairperson: Thomas F. Carney. Thesis (M.A.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 1991.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know