The relationship between communication and cohesion in inter-collegiate rugby players.
1995
- 1,175Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1,175
- Abstract Views825
- Downloads350
Thesis / Dissertation Description
A study was undertaken to examine the relationship between communication and cohesion in inter-collegiate rugby players. Communication in many social systems has been found to be intimately related to other aspects of the group's functionality, including how affiliative or cohesive they are. Certain dimensions of communication are believed to facilitate a cohesive group, including interactions which are honest, supportive, open and direct. This style of communication has been labelled healthy communication. Because of the similarity between sports teams and families and the proven relationship between sport-specific communication patterns and cohesion, it was hypothesized that certain dimensions of communication would be present in rugby teams that would correspond to these healthy patterns in families and that they would be significantly correlated with cohesion. Fifty five male inter-collegiate rugby players completed the Interpersonal Relationship Rating Scale and Group Environment Questionnaire. The results showed that perceived communication was characterized by six factors: Tolerance, Love, Support, Anger, Effectiveness and Confidence as a sports team. Different combinations of these factors significantly predicted each of the four dimensions of group cohesion. Love and Effectiveness were significant in all four models. These findings suggest that rugby teams communicate much like families and, as in these and other systems, healthy communication is intimately tied to group cohesion.Dept. of Kinesiology. Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses & Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis1995 .S94. Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 34-02, page: 0899. Adviser: J. Corlett. Thesis (M.H.K.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 1995.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know