Exploring the energetic consequences and decision-making behaviours of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) foraging on common eider (Somateria mollissima) seaduck eggs on Mitivik Island, Nunavut
2020
- 386Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage386
- Downloads332
- Abstract Views54
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Climate change is projected to further degrade sea-ice conditions in the Arctic, causing disruptions in the foraging ecology of animals. Polar bears (Ursus maritimus) will likely continue to suffer declines in fitness if they are unable to supplement lost on-ice hunting opportunities with terrestrial resources. My thesis aimed to investigate whether polar bears accrue a net energetic gain from foraging on common eider (Somateria mollissima) eggs and whether the decisions they make when foraging on eggs are consistent with optimal foraging theory. Using aerial footage of bears foraging on common eider eggs, I estimated the energetic consequences of foraging on eggs, and examined polar bears’ foraging performance as the resource was depleted. My results indicate that polar bears consumed eggs at a decelerating rate. While the proportion of time spent searching in the colony increased as the season advanced, the energetic cost of searching remained constant throughout the season as a result of similar costs of expenditure across locomotion and feeding. Overall, while some bears gain an energetic surplus from egg foraging, the benefits decline with nest density, resulting in a net loss. Further, my results indicate that as the resource depleted, polar bears did not adjust all their foraging decisions to match resource density. Bears increased their visitation rates to nests that were ‘empty’, despite visiting fewer nests overall. Polar bears did not adjust their movement to nest density, but did become less selective in their choice of which clutches of eggs to consume. Lastly, bears that capitalized on the visual cue of a flushing eider hen to locate nests also significantly increased the number of clutches they consumed.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know