The Continued Prohibition of Cannabis & Racism at Canada’s Borders
2021
- 235Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage235
- Downloads156
- Abstract Views79
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Canada is one of the few jurisdictions in the world where cannabis for personal and recreational purposes is legal. Prior to October 17th 2018, the possession of any quantity of cannabis was a criminal offence, making individuals vulnerable to onerous criminal sanctions. The legislative act that resulted in the decriminalization and regulation of cannabis was framed as a means of advancing public health goals and reducing inequalities. Those once engaged in low level cannabis activities were no longer subject to criminal sanctions within Canada. However, the criminal status and practices upholding the prohibition of cannabis continues at Canada’s borders and international ports of entry. Individuals are still subject to criminal sanctions if caught entering Canada with cannabis. This thesis explores the enduring prohibition of cannabis at Canada’s international ports of entry from the perspective of its theoretical oppressive elements. I will examine the theoretical risk of state-propelled discrimination resulting from the continued prohibition of cannabis at the Canadian border by referencing sources of knowledge and applying that against the conditions surrounding law enforcement at Canada’s international ports of entry. Conclusions drawn about the possibility of discriminatory practices at the border will depend on existing knowledge. Generalizations regarding the theoretical risk of racist practices surrounding the continued prohibition of cannabis on the Canadian side of the Canada-U.S. divide will be made by referencing issues afflicting racialized populations in Canada.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know